|
|
Is Heaven Real? |
|
Is Heaven Real? Today hosts of people are citing and circulating their favorite book to support their assertion that heaven is real. But their favorite book may not be what you think? It's not the Bible and, in many cases, it is quite different than the Bible. The same goes for the question "Is Hell Real?" The Book list continues to grow for both of these questions. Not only are they best sellers in the Christian world, a number have become so-called crossover hits surging to top positions on secular best-selling book lists too. As anyone who knows me is aware, that Heaven and Hell are real is indisputable. How do I know this? On what authority am I resting that such places exist? I know and believe them to be so, solely because the Bible says so. What I know about them is only what the Bible teaches. The Bible as God's complete and full revelation of Himself, and all that I need to know of the spiritual realm, is all that I need to confirm what is true and expose what is false. So a question remains; "Why all the hype and popularity of the plethora of heaven and hell experience books in the last few decades?" And perhaps a second question should be added; "Should we (Christians) be promoting these works?" So how do people select which account they like? The following seems to be the most popular methods: 1) The vision matches up with the reader's preconceptions about what the place is like, or at least a majority of it. 2) The author holds to a similar religious view as the reader. 3) The vision seems to match up with another that was felt to be good. But what exactly is being taught? What message is being sent by these books? To answer this question we'll examine a scattering of such accounts, many relatively current and a few going back quite a few years. Yes, this type of book or account has existed throughout many centuries, though I would suggest that it has increased in the last half-century or so. Showing modern acceptance, the International Association of Near-Death Studies ("an educational nonprofit 501(c)3 organization", www.iands.org) gathers and disseminates these accounts (currently around 1000 of them) and hold conferences about "Lives Changed Forever". When one or more of these match-up with your personal beliefs, they seem great, but many of these events are from wildly differing perspectives; Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Hindu, New Age, and Atheist. Not surprisingly many of the accounts conform nicely to all or some of their respective religious convictions.24 So what does the afterlife truly hold? Heaven is for Real The account which has generated the most recent buzz is "Heaven is for Real" by Todd Burpo (published November 2010). This account is not his own, it is that of his son - his four year old son Colton. Perhaps that is its highest selling quality... how could the account of an innocent four year old be anything but true? A quick summary of the Burpo story goes like this: During a life threatening delayed operation Colton has a near death experience (NDE). It is not a traditional NDE as he never clinically died, so it may be better to call it a vision. During this time Colton professes to have left his body, viewed some earthly happenings and then gone to heaven, subsequently coming back with memories of all this. While in heaven...
Colton saw and experienced all this and more (enough to fill 162 pages of a book) in the three minutes he was in heaven. In fact, Colton professed to be able to see events in the operating room and in other rooms at the hospital during the time he left his body and went to heaven. It took the Burpo's four years to get the whole story out of Colton.
But is it "all right"? Or are some things wrong? And is it right if there is no way to verify it? This leaves lots of questions... Questions
Prophecy and Prophets Even if you attempt to set aside that Colton has given a message that is being accepted by many as if it was Scriptures, consider its' specific content. Colton revealed things that are said to be messages from Jesus to individuals and predictive things regarding the future. This makes him one speaking prophetically. If he professes to be a prophet, the same standard applies in the New Testament as did in the Old for discerning whether someone is a true prophet (Deuteronomy 13:1-5, 18:20-22). Plus, in the example of Scriptures, all authenticated prophets gave testable prophecies that would be fulfilled in their lifetime wherein God had also given them a future prophecy. While the church is commanded very clearly to not despise prophecy, we are additionally called to judge any that come to us with a message that is beyond God's written word (which was always by authenticated prophets and apostles). This is God's standard for the church both then and now:
The standard God set for testing prophecies is fixed and unchangeable: His written Word! If we don't test Colton's prophecy by that Word we are in violation of God's command to "Test everything". Testing by how we feel, or based on our emotions, doesn't come close to meeting this standard and is a subjective trap which can quickly lead astray. Additional issues Colton's parents kept questioning him on what Jesus looked like, showing him numerous traditional earthy paintings and drawings, each of which he rejected - except for one. It was a representation by Akiane Kramarik, a girl, who started having visions at age four (even though born into a family that was atheistic). Colton's parent's now believe they are "looking at the face of Jesus" when they look at her painting.
More on this young girl and her paintings will be in the second section of this article. Does confirmation from another person's vision provide proof that their personal experience is truth? While Scriptures command us to legally establish everything from the mouths of two or three witnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15; John 8:17; 2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19), the context is earthly and verifiable things. It also presupposes reliable and consistent witnesses. Even with all this, it does not guarantee the truth; it becomes a good minimum standard. In regards to spiritual things, whether two or three witnesses or 10,000, it makes no difference if they contradict God's written word. God is the most reliable witness and any who contradicts or add to His word is shown to be a liar.
A third witness for Colton comes from another published author, Don Piper, who professed to have his own heavenly journey. He has subsequently endorsed Colton's account, saying: "Compelling and convincing. It's a book you should read." More on Piper and his books, "90 Minutes in Heaven" and "Heaven is Real", in the second section of this article. De facto equivalence with Scriptures
Are we supposed to be adding to Scriptures? Quite specifically, are we to be adding to God's revelation of heaven and the end times?
Does the writing create a hunger for more of God's word or merely more "secret" revelation? (i.e. Amos 8:11-12). Is the first thought after reading such an account, "I must seek out more of what the Bible teaches" or does it merely fuel desire to seek out another individual's sensational account that with give me more previously unreported detail? Writers of Scriptures were always authenticated prophets or apostles. Is Colton (or others like him) qualified to be a writer of Scriptures?
Even if not accepting Colton's revelation as Scriptures, in the least does not his "revelation" become a greater interpreter of Scriptures than the Holy Spirit? Things that the church has wrestled with throughout history become crystal clear statements in these new revelations. For example:
Those last two statements are emphasized as new revelation, in this fashion, by one Christian book reviewer, who said: "There are a couple things I learned about Heaven from this book that made me really happy". 6 Obviously God had failed to provide these details for almost two thousand years. A pastor wrote:
When someone can make both of those statements, in the same review, it's dangerous. How can you judge accuracy, except by the word of God alone? And if the word of God alone, why do you need this book? Ultimately the extra details (that you can't prove or disprove) become the focus and a source of new revelation. So, in effect, does this make Colin's work a better "revelation" than the Book of Revelation or Scriptures as a whole? It appears that Colton's dad has, to some degree, come to accept them in this fashion.
A pastor is called to preach the infallible word of God and not the fallible account of anyone, whether his own son or otherwise. Colton's experience being preached elevates his words to being equivalent to the word of God and calls on the listener to accept them as such. Puffed Up and Richer Everyone likes to point out the humility of this book writer 9 and, of course, the child himself. But does this meet the test of what God has shown regarding visits to heaven?
The apostle Paul, to us a pretty humble guy, was given a thorn in the flesh to keep him down to earth after his personal visit to heaven. Not to mention that he was not permitted to speak of this personal journey - it was not intended to be Scriptures. John, whose Revelation was intended to be Scriptures by God, did not need another thorn, he was already in exile and ongoing suffering for the cause of Christ. Does being on every talk-show and celebrity venue have anything to do with the humility displayed by Paul or John? Can you image Paul or John selling their account "that God wants everyone to hear" for $13.95? Does making many tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars from this professed revelation have any comparison to Paul or John? 23 Even if some of this gain is publicly given away, as the Burpo's did with at least a little 7, even for a good cause or two, does this aid in humility or act as a means to conceal the fullness of their personal gain? Paul specifically made this clear...
Is All Experience Wrong? God unquestionably does use experience to confirm things to us personally - but experience is not an infallible source of authority. People like to rest in using their experiences solely because it is almost impossible to argue with. How can you say that someone else's experience is wrong? Some churches even say that you should make your experience the focus of your witnessing, solely because it's hard to argue against. But in the end, this elevates your experience above God's perfect word. And, in the post-modern mindset, the contradictory nature of all experience makes it easy to dismiss everything as being merely your own truth. This is why all experience must be judged by an infallible authority, namely the word of God. If any experience is contradicted by properly interpreted Scriptures, the Bible wins every time! The Bible is clear that Scriptures is wholly sufficient in preparing us for life, the experience is good when it confirms this and to be rejected when it doesn't.
So, do I lightly dismiss Colton's vision? Not at all. It is professedly his experience and we can read it as that. He, and we, must judge it by the absolute standard God has set. Helpful or harmful to the cause of Christ?
My answer to the heading "Helpful or harmful to the cause of Christ?" is where I'm sure to get hate mail: I believe that all such works are harmful to the cause of Christ. Here's why: 1) They hold subjective truth to a higher value than objective truth (God's Word). 2) They confuse people as to what is true and important. If God's word is complete and sufficient, give them God's word and have them learn from Him. 3) When used for witnessing, they convert people to a human theological view rather than to the God who is revealed in fullness in His word. This is a shaky foundation for faith. 4) They implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) teach that experience can be elevated above Scriptures or to clarify Scriptures, rather than using Scriptures to clarify experience. 5) They implicitly allow people to seek truth from anyone's experience or vision. For unbelievers this enables them to find it in Catholic mysticism, cults, hosts of false religions, and from virtually any professed believer who has a fantastic experience. Colton's work is perhaps more widely accepted that some other similar heavenly visits for one main reason:
Why do we believe a child is less likely prone to error, or to being deceived, than an adult? As one who has had children and works with children on a regular basis, I can testify to something the Bible makes very clear: we're born sinful. Apart from the grace of God a child can be as deceived as an adult and even demon possessed (consider Mark 9:17-22). I'm not claiming that Colton is possessed, merely that we have to consider the possibility that, yes, even a child can be a willing or unwilling party to a deception. Any perceived apologetic value that could come from the truth that is intermingled throughout the unverifiable experiences and thoughts within this book make it truly useless as an apologetic work. How do we expect an unbeliever to be able to pick through such a work, recognize and cling to God's absolute truth, and discard the human and unreliable aspects? Truth mixed with error is dangerous as it makes the error more palatable for an undiscerning mind. 11
Michael Patton's very valid remarks on this subject bear being repeated:
|
|
Section 2 For those wanting more specifics and examples this section provides such. In giving this it is not necessary to repeat much of what has been already said and which certainly stills applies. For this reason, this section should not be read apart from the first. I cannot attempt to be exhaustive; accounts go back for hundreds of years 25, some attracting widespread and long lasting followings. For example, one famous individual is Emanuel Swedenborg's (1688-1772), father of the cult of Swedenborgianism or what is also called "The New Church". Within his writings is the claim that he had been given permission to freely visit heaven and hell for a twenty-eight year period. His subsequent testimony is filled with unorthodox beliefs including a denial of the Trinity (in contrast to Colton's experience in Section 1). Moving towards the present, other books that could be examined include the New York Times bestselling book (78 weeks at number 1) "Embraced by the Light" by Betty J. Eadie. This 1992 book, which sold over 13 million copies, was followed by other books all to teach what she professed to have learned from Jesus during her 1973 Near Death Experience. The decidedly New Age Jesus that she portrays deviates widely from the Jesus portrayed in Scriptures. Yet her works profess to be giving you the message Jesus wants you to hear on "why there are so many religions; why evil exists; the effects of abortion and suicide; the meaning of life; dreams, visions, NDE's, do pet's go to heaven, and many more." 18 Other elements of her experience include a stereotypical review of her life's works and more exotic things such as see souls getting ready to come to earth (i.e. preexistence of the human soul). There is no message of repentance and need of salvation, merely "what Betty learned is the greatest of all God's gifts: unconditional love". 18 This leaves us to focus on some accounts that have gained widespread popularity within the evangelical Christian word, as did Colton Burpo's. Painting Heaven Akiane Kramarik is the child of a Lithuanian immigrant and an American father. She and her siblings were homeschooled and had no television and few books. Because of this, when she started telling her parents about seeing visions at age four they were fairly certain it wasn't from outside influences. She began writing poetry and sketching and advanced to painting by age 6. Akiane told Children's Digest "I am a self-taught painter. God is my teacher" 12 Both of her parents were atheists at the time but have since converted to Christianity on account of her paintings and visions. Her first completed self-portrait sold for $10,000 and she continues to sell original artworks and prints based on her visions. Her paintings and thoughts invoke statements such as the following:
One published comment about one of her visits with God is as follows:
Whether this description or her widely circulated image of a blue-eyed Jesus ("Prince of Peace"), are either representative of how Jesus and the Father are represented in Scriptures? Does it really matter that some have claimed her image is compatible with the image found on the Roman Catholic Shroud of Turin? 14 What message is she selling to the world through her book (Akiane: Her Life, Her Art, Her Poetry) and venues such as Oprah, World News Tonight, Lou Dobbs Tonight, Good Morning America, Craig Ferguson and more ("Featured on almost 50 international television shows and documentaries" 15)? My wording "selling" is not accidental; she has certainly capitalized on her message as her website features the claim "Inducted into the Richest Kids-Entrepreneurs of America" 15. When asked how she knows that it's God who is speaking to her, her response was "Because I can hear His voice....quiet and beautiful." 13 The Scriptural test for recognizing the voice of God has never been its beauty, rather it's remains the message. God will not contradict his revealed written word. Remember even the devil can masquerade as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14). A few more quotes from Akiane will help to understand her overall message: 16
Akiane certainly has one up on the Apostle's Paul and John, who only got to see heaven once. And as with many such accounts, she got to establish doctrine nowhere established in Scriptures, such as that we get to keep out pets for eternity. Heaven help the poor person who had 100 cats in their lifetime! But serious, is this not an addition to the Book of Revelation? (See Revelation 22:18-19). Heaven is So Real Choo Nam Thomas, a Korean American, became a Christian in 1992. Two years later she had a vision of Jesus at her church (Neighborhood Assembly of God in Tacoma Washington). In 1996 she professed to have been taken to heaven and this visit and subsequent visits ("17 different times") became the subject of her book "Heaven is So Real". It has been translated into at least 43 languages and has been endorsed by the well-known Korean Assemblies of God pastor David Yonggi Cho (his church is called the largest in the world with over a million members). This grandmother spells out clearly some of what she professedly learned in heaven...
Let me summarize a few thoughts from all these statements... 1) God added another book to the Bible for these end times and it's her book (Why add to the book of Revelation when you can add another whole book?) 2) God will use her book to save people 3) God passively cannot do anything about or for those who don't believe in Him 4) All children go to heaven up to age 7 (If you took Romans 9:3 and merged it with this thought, would you be great if you killed as many children as possible before they go to be 8 years old?) 5) Pre-Tribulation is the only correct eschatological view for end-times. 6) God changes his mind regarding the date of the rapture. (Contrast this to 1 Samuel 15:29; Numbers 23:19; 2 Timothy 2:13; Hebrews 6:18) Once again, the "revelation" of her writings pales in comparison to God's word. True experience confirms God's word; deceiving experience is not "His book". The church, contrary to her misquoted Bible reference, is repeatedly called to judge what is taught by God's absolute standard: His Word (Matthew 7:2; 1 Thessalonians 5:20). Fruit is not judged by how many copies of a book are sold or the popularity of a message. Ninety-Minutes in Heaven Baptist pastor Don Piper professes to have spent 90 minutes in heaven following a catastrophic vehicle accident, where he was pronounced dead at the scene. Another pastor, waiting at the scene of the accident, prayed for him after 90 minutes and Piper was returned to life. His memories of paradise are a small portion of his book (less than 20 pages). To be fair, the remainder of the 205 page book spends more time chronicling the accident, his rescue and recovery, plus and lessons learned and applied. This book also became a New York Times Bestseller (with over 4 million in print). Since this heavenly encounter is so short, it provides far less material to evaluate. Actually it doesn't intersect with the Bible in too many places. Another reviewer has said this well:
Two further excerpts from Don Piper's book:
While it's not a sad song, the Bible clearly tells us that one of the heavenly songs is about Jesus' sacrifice and death (see Revelation 5:9 & 12), which contradicts Piper's experience. As with Colton Burpo's account, Don Piper also seems to have merged details of the New Heavens and Earth (including streets of gold and pearly gates, see Revelation 21:15 & 21:21) with the present heaven, yet they are clearly two separate places in Scriptures. It sounds to me more like the product of a fallible mind than a perfect revelation. Moreover, I agree with the reviewer quoted earlier, Piper's heaven is too down to earth and doesn't sparkle with the wonder of seeing Jesus which is what heaven will be all about (and what John is so clearly fascinated with in the Book of Revelation). A Divine Revelation of Hell A Divine Revelation of Hell (published in 1997) is in a similar genre to heaven-visit books, of which there are others including 23 Minutes in Hell by Bill Wiese. "A National Bestseller", it found widespread acceptance in Christian circles and was widely promoted by Christian booksellers and was subsequently translated into Spanish. Its' author, Mark K. Baxter, was conveniently granted a follow-up visit with Jesus that enabled her to publish a sequel entitled "A Divine Revelation of Heaven" (published in 1998). She has additional books featuring her revelations on prayer, deliverance, spiritual warfare, angels, and more. Baxter professed to have had many meetings with Jesus "each night for forty nights", as well journeys to heaven and hell. A look solely at her first book, A Divine Revelation of Hell, will provide sufficient details as to the types of things she is teaching.
According to this, Mary was commissioned by Christ to write another book of Scriptures. It would reveal secrets that no one ever knew before. And certainly Mary's books are filled with such fanciful things. Her description of hell attempts to rival Dante 22. Perhaps the greatest lie is one she attributes to Jesus, whom she has telling her the she could never know for sure that hell is real unless she had experienced it herself. I praise God that I can know hell is real, solely from His word, and that I never have to go there. This whole genre of books featuring "secret" knowledge is merely a modern form of Gnosticism. God's word isn't hidden, it's clearly revealed for all of us to read and know!
|
|
End Notes Rather than quote from "Heaven is So Real" itself, in most places I've referenced just a few of the multitudes of published comments from other people who have read the work. This is intentional to show how the same statements and issues are foremost in the minds of a majority of the readers. 1. Reported on Fox 31 Denver News (kdvr.com). 2. Reported USA Today, 4/21/2011 by Craig Wilson 3. Reported in Reclaiming the Mind book review, 2/06/2011 by C Michael Patton 4. Reported in Fallen From Grace book review, 4/05/2011 by Bruce Gerencser 5. Reported in A Bible Commentary book review, 05/27/2011 by Mural Worthey 6. Prayer Kingdom book review, 08/22/2011 by K Zhang 7. "Colton's mother says the family already supports four orphans in Kenya." 2 8. Reported in Facebook Blog on "Heaven is Real", "90 Minutes in Heaven" and other books about visits to heaven and hell, by Randy Alcorn, 5/09/2011 9. An example of published statements include:
10. Book Review on www.amazon.com by Baptist pastor Micah Mauldin, 11/30/2010 11. Fiction or Non-Fiction: Colton's experience is selling as a non-fiction work. While we have no particular reason to think that Colton's experience is contrived, what makes a personal non verifiable experience something to be labeled non-fiction? Certainly the vision was truly something he experienced personally but does that make the contents of his vision non-fiction? Would this not make Joseph Smith's visions incorporated in the Book of Mormon equally non-fiction? Traditionally only verifiable accounts were considered to be, and sold, as non-fiction. 12. The Examiner.com, article: Akiane Kramarik: Visits to heaven and visions of Jesus, 4/07/2011 13. New Connection, March/April 2006 Living Now "The Inspired Vision of Akiane Kramarik" 14. Shroud of Turin Blog, post by Dan Porter, 2/23/2011 15. www.artakiane.com as of 9/9/2011 16. "I am Co-CREATOR" July 5, 2007, Interview of Akiane with Shawn and Paula (http://kingthunder.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/i-am-a-co-creator/) 17. www.choothomas.com as of 9/9/2011 18. www.embracedbythelight.com as of 9/9/2011 19. Challies.com Book Review - 90 Minutes in Heaven, 4/23/2006 by Tim Challies 20. Book: 90 Minutes in Heaven by Don Piper with Cecil Murphey 21. A Divine Revelation of Hell, 1997, by Mary K. Baxter 22. Dante Alighieri's 14th century classic "Dante's Inferno" 23. A recent announcement adds perspective on the marketing of Heaven is for Real...
24. One published account, on a parody website, merges the contradictory elements of many reports to illustrate how these narratives are seemingly written to appeal to everybody...
25. "Hundreds of years" is a gross understatement. After first publishing this article I stumbled across a much older example: It appears that professed journeys to heaven and hell may be one of the oldest genres in Christian history. The Apocalypse of Peter (or Revelation of Peter), part of the New Testament Apocrypha, which was written circa 135 A.D. is an ancient text claiming such a journey. This book is not to be confused with the similarly named Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter as found at Nag Hammadi. The Apocalypse of Peter was one of a number of Apocalypses that came on the scene following the Revelation of Jesus Christ by the apostle John, all notably as Pseudepigrapha (works published under the name of someone else, often long dead). Clement of Alexandria (lived circa 150-215 A.D) and the Muratorian Fragment (circa 150 A.D.) both imply that some churches actively considered this work to be Scriptures for a time. Its canonicity was never upheld as it failed the test on many levels, most of all being fraudulently attributed to an apostle. While the content was not blatantly heresy, as many other circulating works of the day were (filled with Marcionism or Gnosticism for example), the substance of the work was still out of character to the remainder of canonical Scriptures. It taught, as do most heavenly or hellish journeys, things beyond (or in addition to) Scriptures - including details that some people would want to be true. For the record, a quick summary of some of its teachings include: On Heaven:
On Hell:
While this work may not be exactly the same as the visions and near death experiences that this article is primarily examining, mostly due to its fraudulent authorship, it is similar in that it professes to be a first person journey into heaven and hell. It certainly opened the floodgate of copycat works which would follow (including the 4th century Apocalypse of Paul and the Apocalypse of the Virgin [Mary]. These later works even have Paul or Mary persuading God to give everyone in Hell a day of rest each Sunday). |
|
Article by Brent
MacDonald of Lion Tracks Ministries |